How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech Term Paper - 1

How might we (best) justify the emancipation of legal transfer - Term root word ExampleThis raises questions over the restraint of freedom of speech in protection beyond the minimal dogma of liberty. In my own opinion, there exists no single acknowledgment that would be sufficient to justify freedom of speech. In this regard, therefore, I would advocate for various justifications ground on consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches. This paper seeks to illustrate various viewpoints to the justification of freedom of speech use the communicative principle (Greenawalt 3-15).The philosophical position of a consequentialist approach contributes to coveted set of circumstances and relies on the association of facts between practice and the expected results of such practice. I reserve with the suggestion that the freedom of speech promotes the discovery of truth as put forward by Stuart Mill. Individuals suck the capacity to distinguish true ideas from deceitful ideas i n reality in the presence of free speech. Thus, mass would always demonstration careful discernment in settling for truth. In this case, any claims of value and an understanding by individuals of these claims of value constitute truth. In addition, any sensible idea and level of confidence would agnise individuals to identify truth and conditions that promote it. By contrast, liberal states object the justification of truth discovery based on an assumption that truth does not exist. In their view, neither truth not its conditions could be set and if it does, freedom of speech would contradict the existence of various ideas in practicing the discovery of truth (Greenawalt 16-24).Freedom of speech significantly contributes to social stability and the accommodation of competing desires and interests. This usually occurs during the process of learning where individuals discover other citizenrys desires. Accommodation in free speech creates a balance between conflicting interests us ing truth in resolving issues of concern such as capital punishment.